Purpose

To consolidate, disseminate, and gather information concerning the 710 expansion into our San Rafael neighborhood and into our surrounding neighborhoods. If you have an item that you would like posted on this blog, please e-mail the item to Peggy Drouet at pdrouet@earthlink.net

Thursday, May 30, 2013

Tough House hearing for high-speed rail project

 http://www.ibabuzz.com/politics/2013/05/28/tough-house-hearing-for-high-speed-rail-project/

By Josh Richman, May 28, 2013

 
It looks like supporters of the California High Speed Rail project took a verbal beating Tuesday as the U.S. House Transportation Subcommittee on Railroads, Pipelines and Hazardous Materials held a field hearing in Madera.

“Since Prop 1A was approved by California voters in 2008, the project has more than doubled in cost, and, after more than $3 billion from the federal tax payer, not one shovel has hit the ground,” subcommittee chairman Jeff Denham, R-Modesto, said afterward. “Until I see a viable business plan for high speed rail in California that is fiscally sound and supported by private dollars, I will continue to hold the rail authority accountable to the voters and ensure their taxpayer dollars are spent wisely.”

Here’s some of the questioning:

 http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=RV58Ve0YlR0

he panel, also including Rep. Jim Costa, D-Fresno, and Rep. David Valadao, R-Hanford, grilled witnesses including California High Speed Rail Authority Chairman Dan Richard; Preserve Our Heritage Chairman Kole Upton; Kings County Board of Supervisors Chairman Doug Verboon; Madera County Farm Bureau Executive Director Anja Raudabaugh; Lou Thompson, chairman of the Peer Review Group for the California High-Speed Rail Project; and Greater Fresno Area Chamber of Commerce President and CEO Al Smith.

The witnesses’ prepared testimony, and Denham’s opening statement, are available on Denham’s website.


6 Responses to “Tough House hearing for high-speed rail project”

  1. GV Haste Says:
    One thing about the HSR project, that you can take to the bank, is that the revenue and ridership projections are wildly overstated.
    The project not only will not pay back the construction costs, it will never even run at a break-even basis when counting ongoing costs of labor, maintenance, and equipment replacement (like new BART trains etc.).
    It is nothing more than a construction jobs project.
    California is NOT Japan or Europe. We are also NOT China where you will never have widespread ownership of cars. Where rail has been the primary transport for decades.
    Call me when Canada, Australia, Russia, and Brazil have HSR systems that cover operating costs.
  2. Elwood Says:
    @ 1
    I think you’re being unduly harsh.
    If everyone in CA rides it four times a day at an average ticket cost of $500 it should just about break even.
  3. JohnW Says:
    Proud to say I voted against this. This project is like that train disaster movie starring Denzel Washington, aptly named “Unstoppable.”
  4. Common Tater Says:
    A glimmer of conscience in congress? Wonderful!
  5. Publius Says:
    This was a “verbal beating”? I watched the clip and couldn’t see a confrontation resembling any type of beat down. All I saw was “bi-partisan spirit” and political courtesy. Very little substance.
    California HSR is one of the biggest boondoggles in history and deserves a true beat down.
    @#3
    You may have voted against this project, but as self proclaimed Democrat you support those politicians that are pushing this piece of crap. This job will be under a PLA (Project Labor Agreement) which requires all construction to be performed by Union workers. Your party can’t visit the restroom with out permission from organized labor. This project is another glaring example that the Democrats are owned and operated by the Unions.
  6. RR senile columnist Says:
    Can anyone trace this project back to 2007 or earlier? If so, protesters could chant: “Bush ‘n’ Cheney u can’t hide! U can’t take us fer no ride!”